Induced Effect Analysis of Overseas Gas to Power (GTP) Project

Tae Eui Lee; Yoon Kyung Kim

doi:10.32390/ksmer.2020.57.3.264

All Issue

2020 Vol.57, Issue 3 Preview Page Next Page

Research Paper

Induced Effect Analysis of Overseas Gas to Power (GTP) Project 해외 Gas to Power(GTP) 프로젝트의 파급효과 분석

30 June 2020. pp. 264-274

PDF XML

Abstract

This study analyzed induced effect of production, value-added and employee to quantify the value of company’s cooperation and entry in overseas GTP project. LNG terminal based GTP project and FSRU based GTP project, which are divided seven business were considered in analysis. Construction and operation were also separated. Empirical analysis results showed that project construction had bigger induced effect than that of project operation. And higher contract rate in the secondary industry brought bigger induced production, induced value-added and induced employee. For the bigger induced effect, many company joined detailed business to carry transactions. And higher contract rate of the secondary industry in project construction and higher contract rate in the tertiary industry in project operation also brought bigger induced effect.

Keywords

Gas to Power

Overseas project

Induced effect analysis

본 논문에서는 해외 GTP 프로젝트에서 우리나라 기업의 진출과 협업의 의미를 정량화하기 위해 참여에 의한 생산유발, 부가가치유발, 고용유발을 추정하였다. 분석에서는 LNG 터미널 이용 GTP 프로젝트와 FSRU 이용 GTP 프로젝트를 7가지의 사업으로 세분화하고, 건설과 운영을 분리하였다. 추정 결과에 따르면, 프로젝트의 건설이 많은 다양한 재화와 용역을, 그리고 대규모의 금액을 사용하므로 프로젝트의 운영보다 유발효과가 더 크다. 그리고 2차산업의 수주율이 높아질수록 생산유발, 부가가치유발, 고용유발이 커진다. 기업들이 보다 더 큰 유발효과를 발생시키려면 다수의 기업이 세분화된 각 사업에 참여하여 사업간 거래를 발생시키고, 프로젝트의 건설에서는 2차산업에서의 수주율, 프로젝트의 운영에서는 3차산업에서의 수주율을 높여야 한다.

키워드

Gas to Power

해외프로젝트

유발효과분석

References

Bank of Korea (BOK), 2014. 2010 Input-Output Table, Statistics Book, Bank of Korea (BOK), Korea.

Barnes, J.E., Hooson, S., Ramarao, B., and Nguyen, T., 2017. Review of LNG terminal options shows advantages of FSU facilities, Offshore, Sep 14th, 2017 (2018.8.1., https://www.offshore-mag.com/pipelines/article/16755840/review-of-lng-terminal-options-shows-advantages-of-fsu-facilities).

Energy Information Agency (EIA), 2016a. Capital Cost Estimates for Utility Scale Electricity Generating Plants, Report, p.10-50, USA.

Energy Information Agency (EIA), 2016b. Natural gas generators installed in 2015 by Technology, Report, p.1-30, USA.

FLEX LNG, 2017. Company Presentation, Presentation material, Nov. 2017, Bermuda.

Japan Petroleum Exploration Company (JAPEX), National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), 2014. Energy Project Idea for Fukushima International Research Industry City (Innovation Cost), Presentation Material, Japan.

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Company (KHNP), 2012. Construction cost of LNG Combined Thermal Generation Business, Report, p.97-120, Korea.

Lee, T.E., 2018. Promotion Plan for Oversea LNG Terminal and Pipeline Infra Project, Report for Korea Gas Corporation (KOGAS), Oct 2018, p.55-65, Korea Energy Economics Institute (KEEI), Korea.

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan (METI), 2011. Agenda for Cost Review Committee, Presentation Material, Japan.

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan (METI), 2016. Agenda for Working Group of Energy Industry, Presentation Material, Japan.

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan (MLIT), 2017. Current of Ocean Development Market, Presentation 4-1, Japan.

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of Korea (MOTIE), 2015. 7th Electricity Supply-Demand Basic Plan, Press Releases, Korea.

Mitsubishi Research Institute (MRI), 2016. Research for High Use Infra in Natural Gas of Heisei 28: Natural Gas Pipeline Restructure Guideline Review, Report, p.2-11, Japan.

Peabody Energy, 2007. Economic Benefits of a Coal-Fueled Power Plant Compared to Natural Gas, Report, p.5-8, USA

The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2017. The Outlook for Floating Storage and Regasification Units (FSRUs), Oies Paper, NG 123, July 2017, University Oxford, UK.

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2008, Green Jobs: Towards Decent Work in a Sustainable, Low Carbon World, Report, World Institute, p.120, USA.

Information

Publisher :The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
Publisher(Ko) :한국자원공학회
Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
Journal Title(Ko) :한국자원공학회지
Volume : 57
No :3
Pages :264-274
Received Date : 2020-06-12
Revised Date : 2020-06-23
Accepted Date : 2020-06-25
DOI :https://doi.org/10.32390/ksmer.2020.57.3.264

Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers ISSN:2288-0291(Print) 2288-2790(Online) 한국자원공학회지

All Issue