All Issue

2018 Vol.55, Issue 5 Preview Page

Research Paper

Nationally Determined Contributions Target Achievement and Its Impact on National Energy System

NDC 목표달성과 국가 에너지시스템에 미치는 영향 분석

Minho Baek1
,
Suduk Kim2*
백 민호1
,
김 수덕2*
1아주대학교 에너지시스템 연구센터
2아주대학교 에너지시스템학과
* Corresponding Author
31 October 2018. pp. 452-465
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

This study analyzes the anticipated effects of achieving 37% of GHG reduction by 2030, which is the Nationally Determined Contribution target of Korea and the nuclear downsizing plan using Global Change Assessment Model. The simulation result shows that CO2 emission is expected to increase by 6.9% due to increased fossil fuel power generation for Nuclear Downsizing Scenario. For Abatement Scenario, CO2 abatement cost is expected to be 13 billion 2010 constant dollars in final energy consumption sectors while coal power generation is expected to be reduced by 52%. Finally, the result of the combined scenarios of nuclear downsizing and CO2 abatement shows that the abatement cost is increased by 29.7% while it accelerates the substitution of fossil fuels for renewable energy sources. It is noted that final energy consumption of industrial sector is expected to decline by about 14% due to reduced consumption of energy use and feedstock.

Keywords
Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)
GHG Reduction
Nuclear Downsizing
GCAM (Global Change Assessment Model)

본 연구는 원전감축과 국가 자발적 기여의 감축목표인 Business As Usual 대비 37%의 온실가스 감축을 달성하였을 경우 예상되는 효과를 Global Change Assessment Model을 이용하여 분석하였다. 원전감축 시나리오의 경우, 화석연료 발전의 증가로 CO2 배출량이 6.9% 증가하였다. CO2 감축 시나리오의 경우, 석탄발전량은 52% 감소와 재생에너지 발전량 증가가 예상되며, 최종부문에서는 2010년 불변가격기준 약 13 billion dollars의 감축비용이 발생할 것으로 나타난다. 원전과 CO2 동시 감축 시나리오는 균형 CO2 가격 상승으로 인해 발생한 상호작용으로 감축비용은 29.7% 상승하고 화석연료와 재생에너지의 대체가 가속화된다. 최종에너지 소비부문에서 주목할 부분은 산업부문의 연료소비(Energy Use)와 원료용 에너지(Feedstock) 소비의 감소가 약 14% 예상된다는 점이다.

키워드
국가 자발적 기여
온실가스 감축
원전 감축
GCAM (Global Change Assessment Model)
References
1
Ahn, Y. and Kim, D., 2017. Analysis of domestic and foreign economic impacts using integrated assessment model under the paris agreement. Korea Energy Economics Institute, Ulsan, Korea. p.1-133.
2
Baek, M., Chai, Q., and Kim, S., 2018. Would China be the sole winner in the Northeast Asian ETS market? Unpublished Manuscript, currently under peer review for publication, p.1-19. http://eml.ajou. ac.kr/suduk/teach/contents/Emission%20Trading%20in%20Three%20Northeast%20Asian%20Countries_0619_2.pdf
3
Baek, M., Yurnaidi, Z., Oh, J., and Kim, S., 2016a. Impact analysis of indoor cooling temperature regulation for buildings sectors using GCAM. The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers, 53(1), 10-18.
10.12972/ksmer.2016.53.1.010
4
Baek, M.H., Roh, M.Y., Yurnaidi, Z., and Kim, S.D., 2016b. Abatement potentials of power generation technologies for the achievement of national INDC. Environmental and Resource Economic Review, 25(4), 565-590.
5
Brenkert, L., Smith, J., and Kim, S.H., 2003. Model Documentation for the Mini-CAM, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)-14337, MD, USA, p.1-69.
6
Calvin, K., Clarke, L., Kyle, P., and Wise, M., 2014. Introduction to the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM), Joint GCAM Community Modeling Meeting and GTSP Technical Workshop, Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, Maryland, USA,Wednesday, October 22, 2014.
7
Dowlatabadi, H., 1995. Integrated assessment models of climate change: An incomplete overview. Energy Policy, 23(4-5), 289-296.
10.1016/0301-4215(95)90155-Z
8
Edmonds, J., Calvin, K., Clarke, L., Janetos, A., Kim, S., Wise, M., and McJeon, H., 2012, Integrated assessment modeling. In: Rasch P. (eds) Climate Change Modeling Methodology: Selected Entries from the Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology, Springer, New York, NY, p.169-209.
10.1007/978-1-4614-5767-1_8
9
Government of Korea, 2014. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Roadmap, Sejong, Korea, p.1-114.
10
Government of Korea, 2015a. Submission by the Republic of Korea Intended Nationally Determined Contribution, Bonn, Germany: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, p.1-4.
11
Government of Korea, 2015b. Korea's greenhouse gas reduction target in 2030 Confirmed at 37% of BAU (851 million tonnes), Press Release, Sejong, Korea, p.1-15.
12
Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center (GIR), 2017. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Korea, Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center, Seoul, Korea, p.1-400.
13
Hwang, I., 2017. A review on probabilistic climate-economy models and an application of FUND. Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 26(3), 359-398.
14
Jeon, S., and Kim, S., 2017. Modeling Domestic Transportation Sector Using Global Change Assessment Model. J. Korean Society of Transportation, 35(2), 91-104.
10.7470/jkst.2017.35.2.091
15
Jeong, K., and Hwang, S., 2016. Analysis of Optimal Power Mix in Era of Post-2020. Legislation and Policy Studies, 8(2), 299-318.
16
Kim, S., Lee, M., Moon, K., Nam, J., Roh, B., and Kim, H., 2008. Economic analysis of nuclear energy. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, DaeJeon, Korea. p.1-107.
17
Kim, S., 2014. Development of Global Technology Assessment Tool to Evaluate Energy Efficiency Improvement in Building Sector, Presentation Material for the 2nd Year Evaluation, Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning, 12 December, 2014.
18
Kim, Y.H., 2018. 2030 GHG Reduction Roadmap: Major Direction and Future Plans of Revision and Supplement, Presented at National Assembly Forum - 2030 GHG Reduction Roadmap: Revision, Supplement, and Discussion Issues, Hosted by: National Assembly Forum on Climate Change and Climate Change Center, Meeting Room 1, Member Office Building, National Assembly, 14:00, March 23(Wednesday), Seoul, Korea, p.3-12.
19
Kim, Y., Jang, K., Sohn, W., and Kim, Y., 2008. Economic Impacts of International Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading. Korea Environment Institute, Seoul, Korea, p.1-87.
20
Kim, Y., Jang, K., Lim, J., Jang, D., Min, E., Lee, E., and Jeon, J., 2010. Environment-Economy Model Development (II). Korea Environment Institute, Seoul, Korea. p.1-191.
21
Korea Energy Agency (KEA), 2018. 2018. 8. 10, http://www.energy.or.kr/renew_eng/climate/foundation/reduction.aspx.
22
Lee, M., Song, K., Moon, K., Kim, S., Lim, C., and Oh, K., 2004. Economic analysis of nuclear energy. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, DaeJeon, Korea. p.1-97.
23
Ministry of Strategy and Finance of Korea (MOSF), 2017. The 2nd Basic Plan of Emission Trading, Sejong, Korea, p.1-41.
24
Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2018. 2030 Greenhouse Gase Reduction Roadmap Amendment and Confirmation of Emission Allowance Allocation Plan for 2018-2020, Press Release 24th July, Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea, p.1-13.
25
Ministry of Industry and Energy (MOIE), 2015. The 7th Basic Plan for Long-term Electricity Supply and Demand (2017-2031), Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. p.1-77.
26
Ministry of Industry, Trade, and Energy (MOTIE), 2017a. Energy Transformation Roadmap, Press Release 2017.10.24., Sejong, Korea, p.1-13.
27
Ministry of Industry, Trade, and Energy (MOTIE), 2017b. The Renewable Energy 3020 Implementation Plan (Tentative), Sejong, Korea, p.1-13.
28
Ministry of Industry, Trade, and Energy (MOTIE), 2017c. The 8th Basic Plan for Long-term Electricity Supply and Demand (2017-2031), Sejong, Korea. p.1-99.
29
OECD, 2017.12.20., http://stats.oecd.org/viewhtml.aspx?data-setcode=EO95_LTB&lang=en.
30
Pauliuk, S., Arvesen, A., Stadler, K., and Hertwich, E., 2017. Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models. Nature Climate Change, 7(1), 13-20.
10.1038/nclimate3148
31
Roh, M.Y. and Kim, S.D., 2017. Derivation of sectoral marginal abatement cost curves using GCAM. The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers, 54(1), 20-28.
10.12972/ksmer.2017.54.1.020
32
Stanton, E.A., Ackerman, F., and Kartha, S., 2009. Inside the integrated assessment models: Four issues in climate economics. Climate and Development, 1(2), 166-184.
10.3763/cdev.2009.0015
33
United Nations, 2015. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, DVD Edition, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York, USA.
34
World Nuclear Association (WNA), 2017.01.23., http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles.aspx.
35
World Resource Institute (WRI), 2017.12.20., http://cait.wri.org.
36
Yurnaidi, Z. and Kim, S.D., 2018. Reducing Biomass Utilization in the Ethiopia Energy System: A National Modeling Analysis. Energies 2018, 11(7), 1745.
10.3390/en11071745
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국자원공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국자원공학회지
  • Volume : 55
  • No :5
  • Pages :452-465
  • Received Date : 2018-07-02
  • Revised Date : 2018-10-19
  • Accepted Date : 2018-10-26
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32390/ksmer.2018.55.5.452
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • KCI 문헌 유사도 검사
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close