All Issue

2012 Vol.49, Issue 3 Preview Page

Research Paper

30 June 2012. pp. 281-291
Abstract
One of the most challenging problems for subsurface imaging is removing multiples from marine seismic reflection data. In order to establish multiple suppression processing procedure, we applied Surface-Related Multiple Elimination (SRME), Frequency-Wavenumber (FK) filtering, and predictive deconvolution to synthetic data and seismic field data. In this study, it was verified that the method for combination of SRME module and FK filtering is effective for suppressing multiples produced by free surface in numerical test. To suppress surface multiples in field data which had been acquired at continental shelf, we tried to apply processing procedures of SRME module, FK filtering, and predictive deconvolution to shot gathers which have periodic high amplitude. After obtaining stacked images with shot gathers suppressed surface multiples, we conducted comparative analysis of them. The result shows that the processing procedure combining of SRME module and FK filtering is effective to suppress multiples.
해양 탄성파 반사법 탐사자료에는 다중반사파가 존재하기 때문에 이를 제거하지 않은 탐사자료로 정확한 지하지층구조를 영상화하는 것은 한계가 있다. 본 논문에서는 해수면기인 다중반사파 제거모듈 (Surface-Related Multiple Elimination; SRME)과 주파수-파수(Frequency-Wavenumber; FK) 필터링, 예측 곱풀기를 조합하여 인공합성 탄성파자료와 현장자료에 적용함으로써 다중반사파 제거 자료처리 공정을 확립하였다. 수치모형실험에서 다수의 지층경계면에 의해 생성된 다중반사파를 제거하기 위한 방법으로 SRME 모듈과 FK 필터링을 조합하여 수행하는 것이 효과적임을 입증하였다. 현장자료의 중합단면에서 강한 진폭으로 주기적으로 나타나는 표면 다중반사파(Surface multiple)를 제거하기 위하여 SRME 모듈과 FK 필터링, 예측 곱풀기를 조합하여 음원모음에 적용하고 중합단면을 만들어 비교, 분석 하였다. 그 결과 SPME 모듈과 FK 필터링을 조합한 방법이 효과적임을 알 수 있었다.
References
  1. 고진석, 장성형, 김영완, 2009, “황해 제 3광구 1724 측선 탄성파자료의 중합전 심도 구조보정,” 한국지구시스템공학회, 제46권 5호, pp. 563-570.
  2. 정순홍, 구남형, 김원식, 이호영, 신원철, 박근필, 김진호, 2009, “동해 남동해역 다중채널 해양탄성파 탐사자료의 해저면, 페그-레그 및 자유해수면 다중반사파 제거 최적화 전산처리,” 지구물리와 물리탐사, 제12권 4호, pp. 289-298.
  3. 정순홍, 김원식, 구남형, 유동근, 이호영, 신원철, 박근필, 2008, “도미퇴적분지 해양탄성파 탐사자료 최적 전산처리 변수도출,” 지구물리와 물리탐사, 제11권 4호, pp. 279-285.
  4. Anstey, N.A. and Newman, P., 1966, “The sectional auto-correlogram and the sectional retro-correlogram,” Geophys. Prosp., Vol. 14, No. 12, pp. 389-426.
  5. Berkhout, A.J., 1982, “Seismic migration: Imaging of acoustic energy by wavefield extrapolation. part A: Theoretical aspects,” ElsevierScience, 2nd Ed., pp. 211-218.
  6. Dragoset, W.H. and Jericevic, Z., 1998, “Some remarks on surface multiple attenuation,” Geophysics, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 772-789.
  7. Hadidi, M.T., Baumstein, A.I. and Kim, Y.C., 2002, “Surface-related multiple elimination on wide-tow marine data,” The Leading Edge, pp. 787-790.
  8. Hardy, R.J.J., Hobbs, R.W., Warner, M.R. and Jones, I.F., 1990, “The reliability of multiple suppression,” FIRST BREAK, Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 297-304.
  9. Hardy, R.J.J. and Hobbs, R.W., 1991, “A strategy for multiple suppression,” FIRST BREAK, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 139-144.
  10. Hampson, D., 1986, “Inverse velocity stacking for multiple elimination,” Journal of the Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 44-55.
  11. Keydar, S., Landa, E., Gelchinsky, B. and Belfer, l., 1998, “Multiple prediction using the homeomorphic-imaging technique,” Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 423-440.
  12. Li, H., Huang, Z. and Guo, X., 2009, “Cascade Multiple suppression Techniques in Deepwater Application,” 2009 International Geophysical Conference & Exposition, CPS/SEG, Beijing, China, April 24-27.
  13. Lokshtanov, D., 1995, “Multiple suppression by single channel and multichannel deconvolution in the tau-p domain,” 1995 SEG 65th Annual Meeting, Houston, Texas, USA, October 8-13, pp. 1482-1485.
  14. Mayne, W.H., 1962, “Common reflection point horizontal data stacking technique,” Geophysics, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 927-938.
  15. Peacock, K.L. and Treitel, S., 1969, “Predictive deconvolution: theory and practice,” Geophysics, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 155-169.
  16. Ryu, J.V., 1982, “Decomposition (DECOM) approach applied to wave field analysis with seismic reflection records,” Geophysics, Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 869-883.
  17. Taner, M.T., 1980, “Long period sea-floor multiples and their suppression,” Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 28, pp. 30-48.
  18. Verschuur, D.J., Berkhout, A.J. and Wapenaar, C.P.A., 1992, “Adaptive surface-related multiple elimination,” Geophysics, Vol. 57, No. 9, pp. 1166-1177.
  19. Weglein, A.B., Gasparotto, F.A., Carvalho, P.M. and Stolt, R.H., 1997, “An inverse-scattering series method for attenuating multiples in seismic reflection data,” Geophysics, Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 1975-1989.
  20. Weglein, A.B., 1999, “Multiple attenuation: an overview of recent advances and the road ahead,” The Leading Edge, pp. 40-44.
  21. Wiggins, J.W., 1988, “Attenuation of complex water-bottom multiples by wave-equation-based prediction and subtraction,” Geophysics, Vol. 53, No. 12, pp. 1527-1539.
  22. Wiggins, W., 1999, “Multiple attenuation by explicit wave extrapolation to an interpreted horizon,” The Leading Edge, pp. 46-54.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국자원공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Society for Geosystem Engineering
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지구시스템공학회지
  • Volume : 49
  • No :3
  • Pages :281-291