All Issue

2017 Vol.54, Issue 5 Preview Page

Research Paper

31 October 2017. pp. 533-540
Abstract
References
1
Akimoto, K., Takaki, M. and Tomoda, T., 2007. Economic evaluation of the geological storage of CO2 considering the scale of economy. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1(2), 271-279.
10.1016/S1750-5836(06)00003-X
2
Allinson, G., Neal, P., Ho, M., Wiley, D., and McKee, G.. 2006. CCS Economics methodology and assumptions, Report No: RPT06-0080, The University of NSW, Sydney Australia, CO2CRC: CO2CRC, p.8-46.
3
Berghout, N., Van den Broek, M., and Faaij, A., 2013. Techno-economic performance and challenges of applying CO2 capture in the industry: A case study of five industrial plants. International J. of Greenhouse Gas Control, 17, 259-279.
10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.04.022
4
BERR (Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform) in association with Element Energy, Poyry Energy and the British Geological Survey, 2007. Development of a CO2 transport and storage network in the North Sea, North Sea Basin Task Force, UK Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform, London. p.38-50.
5
Bukhteeva, O., Neal, P., and Allinson, G., 2009. Optimisation economics for CO2 capture and storage in Central Queensland(Australia). Energy Procedia, 1, 3969-3976.
10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.201
6
Craig, M. T., Jaramillo, P., Zhai, H., and Klima, K., 2017. The economic merits of flexible carbon capture and sequestration as a compliance strategy with the clean power plan, Environ-mental Science & Technology, 51, 1102-1109.
10.1021/acs.est.6b0365228001378
7
EPA, 2008. Geologic CO2 sequestration technology and cost analysis. EPA 816-B-08-009, Office of Water, Washington D.C., USA, p.3-37.
8
IEA, 2007. Energy distribution and CO2 capture cost estimation model (monograph on CD-ROM), IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.
9
IEAGHG, 2010. Injection strategies for CO2 storage sites, Report no. 2010/04, Cheltenham, UK. p.3-66.
10
Jakobsen, J., Roussanaly, S., and Anantharaman, R., 2017. A techno-economic case study of CO2 capture, transport and storage chain from a cement plant in Norway. J. of Cleaner Production, 144, 523-539.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.120
11
Kim, J.W. and Kim, H.J.,2013. Literature review for the cost estimation of CCS projects in Korea, J. of KSMER, 50(4), 569-580.
10.12972/ksmer.2013.50.4.569
12
Kim, J.W. and Choi, J.H., 2014. Estimation of carbon capture and storage transport cost in Korea. Geosystem Engineering, 17, 43-50.
10.1080/12269328.2014.895075
13
Kim, J.W. and Choi, J.H., 2016, A preliminary estimation for CCS storage cost of Korea. Geosystem Engineering, 19, 11-18.
10.1080/12269328.2015.1078261
14
Koelbl, B. S., Van den Broek, M. A., Wilting, H. C., Sanders, M. W., Bulavskaya, T. Wood, R., Faaij, A.P.C., and Van Vuuren, D. P., 2016. Socio-economic impacts of low-carbon power generation portfolios : Strategies with and without CCS for the Netherlands, Applied Energy, 183, 257-277.
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.068
15
Koelbl, B. S., Wood, R., Van den Broek, M. A., Sanders, M. W., Faaij, A.P.C., and Van Vuuren, D. P., 2015. Socio-economic impacts of future electricity generation scenarios in Europe: potential costs and benefits of using CO2 capture and storage. International J. of Greenhouse Gas Control, 42, 471-484.
10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.08.010
16
Lewin and Associates Inc., 1981. Economics of enhanced oil recovery. DOE/ET/12072-2, Washington, DC: Department of Energy. p.8-9.
17
Li, W., Jia, Z., and Zhang, H., 2017. The impact of electric vehicles and CCS in the context of emission trading scheme in China: A CGE-based analysis. Energy, 119, 800-816.
10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.059
18
McCoy S. and Rubin E., 2008. An engineering economic model of pipeline transport of CO2 with application to carbon capture and storage. International J. of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2(2), 219-229.
10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00119-3
19
Park, Y.C., Huh, D.G., Yoo, D.G., Hwang, S.H., Lee, H.Y., and Roh, E., 2009. A review of business model for CO2 geological storage project in Korea. J. of the Geological Society of Korea, 45(5), 579-587.
20
Pettinau, A., Ferrara, F., Tola, V., and Cau, G., 2017. Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal. Applied Energy, 193, 426-439.
10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.056
21
SACCCS (South African Centre for Carbon Capture and Storage), 2013. Impacts of carbon capture and storage (CCS) on South African National Priorities other than Climate Change. Doc. no. 1 (Rev 8), p.29-48.
22
Siefert, N. S. and Litster, S., 2013. Exergy and economic analyses of advanced IGCC-CCS and IGFC-CCS power plants. Applied Energy, 107, 315-328.
10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.006
23
Valenti, V., ikovi, S. and Vikovi, A., 2016. Can CCS save coal fired power plants - The European perspective. International J. of Greenhouse Gas Control, 47, 266-278.
10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.01.037
24
Van der Wijk, P.C., Brouwer, A. S., Van den Broek, M., Thijs Slota, Gerard Stienstra, Van der Veen, W., and Faaij, A.P.C., 2014. Benefits of coal-fired power generation with flexible CCS in a future northwest European power system with large scale wind power. International J. of Greenhouse Gas Control, 28, 216-233.
10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.06.014
25
Vidas, H., B. Hugman, A. Chikkatur, and B. Venkatesh, 2012. Analysis of the costs and benefits of CO2 sequestration on the U.S. outer continental shelf. OCS Study BOEM 2012-100, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. Herndon, Virginia. p.53-82.
26
ZEP, 2011a. The costs of CO2 capture, post-demonstration CCS in the EU(Monograph in electronic format). Global CCS Institute.
27
ZEP, 2011b. The costs of CO2 capture, transport and storage(Monograph in electronic format). Global CCS Institute.
28
ZEP, 2011c. The costs of CO2 storage: post-demonstration CCS in the EU(Monograph in electronic format). Global CCS Institute.
29
ZEP, 2013. CO2 capture and storage (CCS): recommendations for transitional measures to drive deployment in Europe(Monog-raph in electronic format). Global CCS Institute.
30
ZEP, 2014. ZEP input to the CCS directive review(Monograph in electronic format). Global CCS Institute.
31
ZEP, 2015. ZEP response to the CCS directive evaluation(Mono-graph in electronic format). Global CCS Institute.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국자원공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국자원공학회지
  • Volume : 54
  • No :5
  • Pages :533-540
  • Received Date : 2017-10-12
  • Revised Date : 2017-10-26
  • Accepted Date : 2017-10-26