All Issue

2022 Vol.59, Issue 5S Preview Page

Review

31 October 2022. pp. 585-597
Abstract
References
1
Accomando, F., Vitale, A., Bonfante, A., Buonanno, M., and Florio, G., 2021. Performance of two different flight configurations for drone-borne magnetic data, Sensors, 21(17), p.5736. 10.3390/s2117573634502628PMC8433984
2
Amigun, J.O., Afolabi, O., and Ako, B.D., 2012. Application of airborne magnetic data to mineral exploration in the Okene Iron Ore Province of Nigeria, International Research Journal of Geology and Mining, 2(6), p.132-140.
3
Butler, D.K., Wolfe, P.J., and Hansen, R.O., 2001. Analytical modeling of magnetic and gravity signatures of unexploded ordnance, Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 6(1), p.33-46. 10.4133/JEEG6.1.33
4
Døssing, A., Lima Simoes da Silva, E., Martelet, G., Maack Rasmussen, T., Gloaguen, E., Thejll Petersen, J., and Linde, J., 2021. A high-speed, light-weight scalar magnetometer bird for km scale UAV magnetic surveying: On sensor choice, bird design, and quality of output data, Remote Sensing, 13(4), p.649. 10.3390/rs13040649
5
Dragomiretskiy, K. and Zosso, D., 2013. Variational mode decomposition, IEEE transactions on signal processing, 62(3), p.531-544. 10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675
6
Huang, N.E., Shen, Z., Long, S.R., Wu, M.C., Shih, H.H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.-C., Tung, C.C., and Liu, H.H., 1998. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis, Proc. of the Royal Society of London. Series A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 454(1971), p.903-995. 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193
7
Kass, M.A., Christiansen, A.V., Auken, E., and Larsen, J.J., 2020. Efficient reduction of powerline signals in magnetic data acquired from a moving platform, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 59(8), p.7137-7146. 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3029658
8
Kim, B., 2020. Aeromagnetic exploration using unmanned aerial vehicles: Current and future trends, Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration, 23(3), p.178-191. (in Korean)
9
Kim, B., Jeong, S., Bang, E., Shin, S., and Cho, S., 2021. Investigation of iron ore mineral distribution using aero- magnetic exploration techniques: Case study at Pocheon, Korea, Minerals, 11(7), p.665. 10.3390/min11070665
10
Kolster, M. E. and Døssing, A., 2020. Scalar magnetic difference inversion applied to UAV-based UXO detection, Geophysical Journal International, 224(1), p.468-486. 10.1093/gji/ggaa483
11
Kolster, M. E., Wigh, M. D., Silva E. L., Bjerg Vilhelmsen, T. B., and Døssing, A., 2022. High-speed magnetic surveying for unexploded ordnance using UAV systems, Remote Sensing, 14(5), p.1134. 10.3390/rs14051134
12
Levenberg, K., 1944. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares, Quarterly of applied mathematics, 2(2), p.164-168. 10.1090/qam/10666
13
Li, Y., Li, Y., Chen, X., and Yu, J., 2017. Denoising and feature extraction algorithms using NPE combined with VMD and their applications in ship-radiated noise, Symmetry, 9(11), p.256. 10.3390/sym9110256
14
Liu, W., Cao, S., and Chen, Y., 2016. Applications of variational mode decomposition in seismic time-frequency analysis, Geophysics, 81(5), p.V365-V378. 10.1190/geo2015-0489.1
15
Malehmir, A., Dynesius, L., Paulusson, K., Paulusson, A., Johansson, H., Bastani, M., Wedmark, M., and Marsden, P., 2017. The potential of rotary-wing UAV-based magnetic surveys for mineral exploration: A case study from central Sweden, The Leading Edge, 36(7), p.552-557. 10.1190/tle36070552.1
16
Marquardt, D.W., 1963. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters, Journal of the society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(2), p.431-441. 10.1137/0111030
17
Mu, Y., Xie, W., and Zhang, X., 2021. The joint UAV-borne magnetic detection system and cart-mounted time domain electromagnetic system for UXO detection, Remote Sensing, 13(12), p.2343. 10.3390/rs13122343
18
Mu, Y., Zhang, X., Xie, W., and Zheng, Y., 2020. Automatic detection of near-surface targets for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) magnetic survey, Remote Sensing, 12(3), p.452. 10.3390/rs12030452
19
Mukherjee, S., Bell, R. S., Barkhouse, W. N., Adavani, S., Lelièvre, P. G., and Farquharson, C. G., 2022. High-resolution imaging of subsurface infrastructure using deep learning artificial intelligence on drone magnetometry, The Leading Edge, 41(7), p.462-471. 10.1190/tle41070462.1
20
Nabighian, M.N., 1972. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophysics, 37(3), p.507-517. 10.1190/1.1440276
21
Nikulin, A., deSmet, T., Puliaiev, A., Zhurakhov, V., Fasullo, S., Chen, G., Spiegel, I., and Cappuccio, K., 2020. Automated UAS aeromagnetic surveys to detect MBRL unexploded ordnance, The Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction, 24(1), p.56-62. 10.21608/smj.2020.39264.1180
22
Parshin, A.V., Morozov, V.A., Blinov, A.V., Kosterev, A.N., and Budyak, A.E., 2018. Low-altitude geophysical magnetic prospecting based on multirotor UAV as a promising replacement for traditional ground survey, Geo-spatial information science, 21(1), p.67-74. 10.1080/10095020.2017.1420508
23
Parvar, K., 2016. Development and evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) magnetometry systems, Master's Thesis, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, p.60-65.
24
Parvar, K., Braun, A., Layton-Matthews, D., and Burns, M., 2018. UAV magnetometry for chromite exploration in the Samail ophiolite sequence, Oman, Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, 6(1), p.57-69. 10.1139/juvs-2017-0015
25
Redmon, J. and Farhadi, A., 2018. Yolov3: An incremental improvement, arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767.
26
Roest, W.R., Verhoef, J., and Pilkington, M., 1992. Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal, Geophysics, 57(1), p.116-125. 10.1190/1.1443174
27
Schmidt, V., Becken, M., and Schmalzl, J., 2020. A UAV- borne magnetic survey for archaeological prospection of a Celtic burial site, First Break, 38(8), p.61-66. 10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020061
28
Spector, A. and Lawler, T.L., 1995. Application of aeromagnetic data to mineral potential evaluation in Minnesota, Geophysics, 60(6), p.1704-1714. 10.1190/1.1443903
29
Stoll, J. B., 2013. Unmanned aircraft systems for rapid near surface geophysical measurements, Proc. of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Rostock, Germany, p.391-394. 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W2-391-2013
30
Taylor, P. T., Zietz, I., and Dennis, L. S., 1968. Geological implications of aeromagnetic data for the eastern continental margin of the united states, Geophysics, 33(5), p.755-780. 10.1190/1.1439970
31
Thompson, D.T., 1982. EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data, Geophysics, 47, p.31-37. 10.1190/1.1441278
32
Torres, M.E., Colominas, M.A., Schlotthauer, G., and Flandrin, P., 2011. A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise, Proc. of the 2011 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), Prague, Czech Republic, p. 4144-4147. 10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947265
33
Walter, C., Braun, A., and Fotopoulos, G., 2019a. Spectral analysis of magnetometer swing in high-resolution UAV-borne aeromagnetic surveys, Proc. of the 2019 IEEE Systems and Technologies for Remote Sensing Applications Through Unmanned Aerial Systems (STRATUS), Rochester, NY, USA, p.1-4. 10.1109/STRATUS.2019.8713313
34
Walter, C., Braun, A., and Fotopoulos, G., 2019b. Impact of 3-D attitude variations of a UAV magnetometry system on magnetic data quality, Geophysical Prospecting, 67, p.465-479. 10.1111/1365-2478.12727
35
Walter, C., Braun, A., and Fotopoulos, G., 2020. High-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle aeromagnetic surveys for mineral exploration targets, Geophysical Prospecting, 68, p.334-349. 10.1111/1365-2478.12914
36
Walter, C., Braun, A., and Fotopoulos, G., 2021. Characterizing electromagnetic interference signals for unmanned aerial vehicle geophysical surveys, Geophysics, 86(6), p.J21-J32. 10.1190/geo2020-0895.1
37
Yoo, L., Lee, J., Ko, S., Jung, S., Lee, S., and Lee, Y., 2020. A drone fitted with a magnetometer detects landmines, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 17(12), p.2035-2039. 10.1109/LGRS.2019.2962062
38
Yoo, L., Lee, J., Lee, Y., Jung, S., and Choi, Y., 2021. Application of a drone magnetometer system to military mine detection in the demilitarized zone, Sensors, 21(9), p.3175. 10.3390/s2109317534063580PMC8125094
39
Zheng, Y., Li, S., Xing, K., and Zhang, X., 2021. A novel noise reduction method of UAV magnetic survey data based on CEEMDAN, permutation entropy, correlation coefficient and wavelet threshold denoising, Entropy (Basel), 23(10), p.1309. 10.3390/e2310130934682033PMC8534471
40
Zheng, Y., Li, S., Xing, K., and Zhang, X., 2022. Processing and interpretation of UAV magnetic data: A workflow based on improved variational mode decomposition and Levenberg- Marquardt algorithm, Drones, 6(1), p.11. 10.3390/drones6010011
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국자원공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국자원공학회지
  • Volume : 59
  • No :5
  • Pages :585-597
  • Received Date : 2022-10-01
  • Revised Date : 2022-10-23
  • Accepted Date : 2022-10-26