All Issue

2022 Vol.59, Issue 2 Preview Page

Technical Report

Seismic Interferometry: Research Trends and Technological Introduction

탄성파 간섭법 탐사 연구 동향 및 기술소개

Inseok Joung1
,
Ahyun Cho2
,
Hanna Jang3
,
Bitnarae Kim4
,
Chang Soo Cho5
,
Myung Jin Nam67*
정 인석1
,
조 아현2
,
장 한나3
,
김 빛나래4
,
조 창수5
,
남 명진67*
1Combined Master's and Doctorate Degree, Department of Energy & Mineral Resources Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea
2Combined Master's and Doctorate Degree, Department of Energy & Mineral Resources Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea
3Master's Degree, Department of Energy & Mineral Resources Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea
4Post-doc, DGR/CIM, BRGM-Service Geologique national, Orleans, France
5Principal Researcher, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon, Korea
6Professor, Department of Energy & Mineral Resources Engineering, Sejong University
7Professor, Department of Energy Resources and Geosystems Engineering, Sejong University
1세종대학교 에너지자원공학과 석박사통합과정
2세종대학교 에너지자원공학과 석박사통합과정
3세종대학교 에너지자원공학과 석사과정
4프랑스 BRGM 박사후연구원
5한국지질자원연구원 지진연구센터 책임연구원
6세종대학교 에너지자원공학과 교수
7세종대학교 지구자원시스템공학과 교수
*Corresponding Author
30 April 2022. pp. 205-217
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

In the seismic interferometry (SI) method, cross correlation of seismic recordings at two receivers is performed to retrieve an estimate of the seismic trace at one of the receivers while the other acts as a so-called “virtual source” to obtain subsurface information. In this article, basic SI theories are described, and past cases in which SI methods were used are analyzed. SI, which mainly uses cross correlation, can be performed using deconvolution or coherence, and each SI method can be applied to seismic reflection, refraction, and surface wave survey data. Because the virtual source can be positioned at all receiver locations and active sources are not necessary, SI is an extremely effective monitoring technique. SI has been applied to such fields as geological imaging, fault detection, and structural health.

Keywords
Seismic interferometry
Cross-correlation
Virtual source

탄성파 간섭법은 측정한 트레이스들 사이의 간섭현상을 이용하여 가상의 송신원을 생성하고 새로운 탄성파 신호를 만들어 지하매질에 관한 정보를 얻는 방법이다. 이 논문에서는 탄성파 간섭법의 기본적인 이론과 활용방법 그리고 실제 적용사례들을 분석해 기술보고 형식으로 소개하고자 한다. 탄성파 간섭법에는 교차상관(cross correlation)을 이용하는 가장 기본적인 방법과 곱풀기(deconvolution), 결맞음(coherence)을 이용하는 방법들이 있으며 각각의 방법들은 탄성파 반사파, 굴절파, 표면파 탐사데이터에 적용될 수 있다. 모든 수신기 위치에 가상 송신원을 위치시킬 수 있고 인공적인 송신원이 필요없다는 장점 때문에 모니터링 분야에서 큰 효과를 보여준다. 탄성파 간섭법을 적용하고 있는 분야로는 크게 지하구조 영상화와 건축물 안정성 평가로 나눌 수 있으며 지질 구조 영상화, 단층의 유무 판단, 모니터링 등 다양하게 사용된다.

키워드
탄성파 간섭법
교차상관
가상 송신원
References
1
Bensen, G.D., Ritzwoller, M.H., Barmin, M.P., Levshin, A.L., Lin, F., Moschetti, M.P., and Yang, Y., 2007. Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements, Geophysical Journal International, 169(3), p.1239-1260. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x
2
Bharadwaj, P., Schuster, G., Mallinson, I., and Dai, W., 2012. Theory of supervirtual refraction interferometry, Geophysical Journal International, 188(1), p.263-273. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05253.x
3
Boullenger, B., Verdel, A., Paap, B., Thorbecke, J., and Draganov, D., 2015. Studying CO2 storage with ambient- noise seismic interferometry: A combined numerical feasibility study and field-data example for Ketzin, Germany, Geophysics, 80(1), p.Q1-Q13. 10.1190/geo2014-0181.1
4
Breton, M., Bontemps, N., Guillemot, A., Baillet, L., and Larose, É., 2021. Landslide monitoring using seismic ambient noise correlation: challenges and applications, Earth-Science Reviews, 103518p. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103518
5
Bulajić, B.Đ., Todorovska, M.I., Manić, M.I., and Trifunac, M.D., 2020. Structural health monitoring study of the ZOIL building using earthquake records, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 133, 106105p. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106105
6
Campillo, M. and Paul, A., 2003. Long-range correlations in the diffuse seismic coda, Science, 299(5606), p.547-549. 10.1126/science.107855112543969
7
Casas, J.A., Badi, G.A., Franco, L., and Draganov, D., 2020. Seismic interferometry applied to regional and teleseismic events recorded at Planchón-Peteroa Volcanic Complex, Argentina-Chile, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 393, 106805p. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.106805
8
Cheraghi, S., White, D.J., Draganov, D., Bellefleur, G., Craven, J.A., and Roberts, B., 2017. Passive seismic reflection interferometry: A case study from the Aquistore CO2 storage site, Saskatchewan, Canada, Geophysics, 82(3), p.B79-B93. 10.1190/geo2016-0370.1
9
Claerbout, J.F., 1968. Synthesis of a layered medium from its acoustic transmission response, Geophysics, 33(2), p.264-269. 10.1190/1.1439927
10
Curtis, A., Gerstoft, P., Sato, H., Snieder, R., and Wapenaar, K., 2006. Seismic interferometry-Turning noise into signal, The Leading Edge, 25(9), p.1082-1092. 10.1190/1.2349814
11
Czarny, R., Pilecki, Z., and Drzewińska, D., 2018. The application of seismic interferometry for estimating a 1D S-wave velocity model with the use of mining induced seismicity, Journal of Sustainable Mining, 17(4), p.209-214. 10.1016/j.jsm.2018.09.001
12
Dalen, K.N., Wapenaar, K., and Halliday, D.F., 2014. Surface wave retrieval in layered media using seismic interferometry by multidimensional deconvolution, Geophysical Journal International, 196(1), p.230-242. 10.1093/gji/ggt389
13
Dong, S., Sheng, J., and Schuster, G.T., 2006. Theory and Practice of Refraction Interferometry. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, p.3021-3025. 10.1190/1.2370154
14
Draganov, D., Wapenaar, K., Mulder, W., Singer, J., and Verdel, A., 2007. Retrieval of reflections from seismic background‐noise measurements, Geophysical Research Letters, 34(4), L04305p. 10.1029/2006GL028735
15
Ebrahimian, M., Rahmani, M., and Todorovska, M.I., 2014. Nonparametric estimation of wave dispersion in high‐rise buildings by seismic interferometry, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 43(15), p.2361-2375. 10.1002/eqe.2453
16
Fang, H., Yao, H., Zhang, H., Huang Y.C., and Van der Hilst, R.D., 2015. Direct inversion of surface wave dispersion for three-dimensional shallow crustal structure based on ray tracing: methodology and, Geophysical Journal International, 201, p.1251-1263. 10.1093/gji/ggv080
17
Fink, M., 1997. Time reversed acoustics, Physics today, 50(3), p.34-40. 10.1063/1.881692
18
Forghani, F. and Snieder, R., 2010. Underestimation of body waves and feasibility of surface-wave reconstruction by seismic interferometry, The Leading Edge, 29(7), p.790-794. 10.1190/1.3462779
19
García-Macías, E. and Ubertini, F., 2019. Seismic interferometry for earthquake-induced damage identification in historic masonry towers, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 132, p.380-404. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.037
20
Gerstoft, P., Sabra, K.G., Roux, P., Kuperman, W.A., and Fehler, M.C., 2006. Green's functions extraction and surface-wave tomography from microseisms in southern California, Geophysics, 71(4), p.SI23-SI31. 10.1190/1.2210607
21
Guillemot, A., Helmstetter, A., Larose, É., Baillet, L., Garambois, S., Mayoraz, R., and Delaloye, R., 2020. Seismic monitoring in the Gugla rock glacier (Switzerland): ambient noise correlation, microseismicity and modelling, Geophysical Journal International, 221(3), p.1719-1735. 10.1093/gji/ggaa097
22
Harba, P., Pilecki, Z., and Krawiec, K., 2019. Comparison of MASW and seismic interferometry with use of ambient noise for estimation of S-wave velocity field in landslide subsurface, Acta Geophysica, 67(6), p.1875-1883. 10.1007/s11600-019-00344-9
23
Kang, T., 2011. Extraction of a Signal by Using Cross-correlation of Ambient Seismic Noise, Physics and High Technology, 20(8), p.18-21. 10.3938/PhiT.20.032
24
Kim, K., Park, I., and Byun, J., 2018. Characteristics of Virtual Reflection Images in Seismic Interferometry Using Synthetic Seismic Data, Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration, 21(2), p.94-102.
25
Kim, S., Tkalčić, H., Rhie, J., and Chen. Y., 2016. Intraplate volcanism controlled by back-arc and continental structures in NE Asia inferred from trans-dimensional Bayesian ambient noise tomography, Geophysical Research Letters, 43, p.8390-8398. 10.1002/2016GL069483
26
Kim, Y., Jang, S., and Doan, H., 2011. Prestack Depth Migration Using Seismic Virtual Source Gathers, Journal of the Korean Society for Geosystem Engineering, 48(3), p.309-322.
27
Ko, J. and Jang, S., 2017. Study On Virtual Shot Gather Using Seismic Interferometry, Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology, 10(1), p.53-58. 10.35272/jaet.2017.10.1.53
28
Kohler, M.D., Heaton, T.H., and Bradford, S.C., 2007. Propagating waves in the steel, moment-frame factor building recorded during earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(4), p.1334-1345. 10.1785/0120060148
29
Lacanna, G., Ripepe, M., Coli, M., Genco, R., and Marchetti, E., 2019. Full structural dynamic response from Giotto's bell tower ambient vibration in Firenze (Italy), using modal analysis and seismic interferometry, NDT & E International, 102, p.9-15. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.002
30
Larose, E., Margerin, L., Derode, A., van Tiggelen, B., Campillo, M., Shapiro, N., and Tanter, M., 2006. Correlation of random wavefields: An interdisciplinary review, Geophysics, 71(4), p.SI11-SI21. 10.1190/1.2213356
31
Lawrence, J.F. and Prieto, G., 2011, Attenuation tomography of the western United States from ambient seismic noise, Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, B06302p. 10.1029/2010JB007836
32
Lobkis, O.I. and Weaver, R.L., 2001. On the emergence of the Green's function in the correlations of a diffuse field, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(6), p.3011-3017. 10.1121/1.1417528
33
Lopez-Caballero, F. and Mercerat, E. D., 2018. Damage Evaluation of RC Building With Soil-Structure Interaction By Seismic Interferometry: A Numerical Case Study, In 16th European Earthquake Engineering Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece.
34
Louie, J.N., 2001. Faster, better: shear-wave velocity to 100 meters depth from refraction microtremor arrays, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(2), p.347-364. 10.1785/0120000098
35
Lu, K. and Chávez-Pérez, S., 2020. 3D supervirtual refraction interferometry, Geophysics, 85(3), p.Q1-Q10. 10.1190/geo2019-0097.1
36
Luo, Y., Yang, Y., Xu, Y., Xu, H., Zhao, K., and Wang, K., 2015. On the limitations of interstation distances in ambient noise tomography, Geophysical Journal International, 201, p.652-661. 10.1093/gji/ggv043
37
Matzel, E., Zeng, X., Thurber, C., Luo, Y., and Morency, C., 2017. Seismic interferometry using the dense array at the Brady geothermal field, In Proceedings of the 42nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA, p.13-15.
38
Miyazawa, M., Snieder, R., and Venkataraman, A., 2008. Application of seismic interferometry to extract P-and S-wave propagation and observation of shear-wave splitting from noise data at Cold Lake, Alberta, Canada, Geophysics, 73(4), p.D35-D40. 10.1190/1.2937172
39
Mordret, A., Sun, H., Prieto, G. A., Toksöz, M.N., and Büyüköztürk, O., 2017. Continuous monitoring of high‐rise buildings using seismic interferometry, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107(6), p.2759-2773. 10.1785/0120160282
40
Nakata, N. and Snieder, R., 2014. Monitoring a building using deconvolution interferometry. II: Ambient‐vibration analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(1), p.204-213. 10.1785/0120130050
41
Nakata, N., Snieder, R., Kuroda, S., Ito, S., Aizawa, T., and Kunimi, T., 2013. Monitoring a building using deconvolution interferometry. I: Earthquake‐data analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(3), p.1662-1678. 10.1785/0120120291
42
Nakata, N., Snieder, R., Tsuji, T., Larner, K., and Matsuoka, T., 2011. Shear wave imaging from traffic noise using seismic interferometry by cross-coherence, Geophysics, 76(6), p.SA97-SA106. 10.1190/geo2010-0188.1
43
Nilot, E., Li, Y.E., and Lythgoe, K., 2020. Bedrock detection based on seismic interferometry using ambient noise in Singapore, In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2020, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Huston, United States, p.3577-3581. 10.1190/segam2020-3427558.1
44
Nishitsuji, Y., Minato, S., Boullenger, B., Gomez, M., Wapenaar, K., and Draganov, D., 2016. Crustal-scale reflection imaging and interpretation by passive seismic interferometry using local earthquakes, Interpretation, 4(3), p.SJ29-SJ53. 10.1190/INT-2015-0226.1
45
O'Connell, D.R. and Turner, J.P., 2011. Interferometric multichannel analysis of surface waves (IMASW), Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(5), p.2122-2141. 10.1785/0120100230
46
Park, C.B., Miller, R.D., and Xia, J., 1999. Multichannel analysis of surface waves, Geophysics, 64(3), p.800-808. 10.1190/1.1444590
47
Plaen, R.S., Cannata, A., Cannavo, F., Caudron, C., Lecocq, T., and Francis, O., 2019. Temporal changes of seismic velocity caused by volcanic activity at Mt. Etna revealed by the autocorrelation of ambient seismic noise, Frontiers in Earth Science, 6, 251p. 10.3389/feart.2018.00251
48
Prieto, G.A., Lawrence, J.F., and Beroza, G.C., 2009. Anelastic Earth structure from the coherency of the ambient seismic field, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 114(B7), B07303p. 10.1029/2008JB006067
49
Prieto, G.A., Lawrence, J.F., Chung, A.I., and Kohler, M.D., 2010. Impulse response of civil structures from ambient noise analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(5A), p.2322-2328. 10.1785/0120090285
50
Rahmani, M., Ebrahimian, M., and Todorovska, M.I., 2015. Time‐wave velocity analysis for early earthquake damage detection in buildings: Application to a damaged full‐scale RC building, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44(4), p.619-636. 10.1002/eqe.2539
51
Ritzwoller, M.H., Lin, F.C., and Shen, W., 2011. Ambient noise tomography with a large seismic array, Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 343, p.558-570. 10.1016/j.crte.2011.03.007
52
Schuster, G., 2009. Seismic interferometry, Cambridge university press, England, 279p.
53
Schuster, G.T., 2001. Theory of daylight/interferometric imaging-tutorial, In 63rd EAGE conference & exhibition. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, cp-15. 10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.15.A-32
54
Shapiro, N.M. and Campillo, M., 2004. Emergence of broadband Rayleigh waves from correlations of the ambient seismic noise, Geophysical Research Letters, 31(7), L07614p. 10.1029/2004GL019491
55
Shapiro, N.M., Campillo, M., Stehly, L., and Ritzwoller, M.H., 2005. High-resolution surface-wave tomography from ambient seismic noise, Science, 307(5715), p.1615-1618. 10.1126/science.110833915761151
56
Snieder, R. and Safak, E., 2006. Extracting the building response using seismic interferometry: Theory and application to the Millikan Library in Pasadena, California, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(2), p.586-598. 10.1785/0120050109
57
Snieder, R., 2006. The theory of coda wave interferometry, Pure and Applied geophysics, 163(2), p.455-473. 10.1007/s00024-005-0026-6
58
Snieder, R., Miyazawa, M., Slob, E., Vasconcelos, I., and Wapenaar, K., 2009. A comparison of strategies for seismic interferometry, Surveys in Geophysics, 30(4-5), p.503-523. 10.1007/s10712-009-9069-z
59
Sun, H., Mordret, A., Prieto, G.A., Toksöz, M.N., and Büyüköztürk, O., 2017. Bayesian characterization of buildings using seismic interferometry on ambient vibrations, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 85, p.468-486. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.08.038
60
Todorovska, M.I. and Trifunac, M.D., 2008. Earthquake damage detection in the Imperial County Services Building III: analysis of wave travel times via impulse response functions, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28(5), p.387-404. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.07.001
61
Vasconcelos, I. and Snieder, R., 2008. Interferometry by deconvolution: Part 1-Theory for acoustic waves and numerical examples, Geophysics, 73(3), p.S115-S128. 10.1190/1.2904554
62
Verdel, A., Boullenger, B., Martins, J.E., Obermann, A., Toledo, T., and Jousset, P., 2019. Ambient noise seismic reflection interferometry at the Los Humeros geothermal field, Mexico, In European Geothermal Congress 2019, The Hague, The Netherlands.
63
Voisin, C., Garambois, S., Massey, C., and Brossier, R., 2016. Seismic noise monitoring of the water table in a deep-seated, slow-moving landslide, Interpretation, 4(3), p.SJ67-SJ76. 10.1190/INT-2016-0010.1
64
Wapenaar, K., Draganov, D., Snieder, R., Campman, X., and Verdel, A., 2010. Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 1-Basic principles and applications, Geophysics, 75(5), p.195-209. 10.1190/1.3457445
65
Wapenaar, K., Draganov, D., Van Der Neut, J., and Thorbecke, J., 2004. Seismic interferometry: a comparison of approaches, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, p.1981-1984. 10.1190/1.1851182
66
Wapenaar, K., Van Der Neut, J., Ruigrok, E., Draganov, D., Hunziker, J., Slob, E., and Snieder, R., 2011. Seismic interferometry by crosscorrelation and by multidimensional deconvolution: A systematic comparison, Geophysical Journal International, 185(3), p.1335-1364. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05007.x
67
Wen, W. and Kalkan, E., 2017. System identification based on deconvolution and cross correlation: An application to a 20‐story instrumented building in Anchorage, Alaska, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107(2), p.718-740. 10.1785/0120160069
68
Yao, H. and Van der Hilst, R.D., 2009. Analysis of ambient noise energy distribution and phase velocity bias in ambient noise tomography, with application to SE Tibet, Geophysical Journal International, 179, p.1113-1132. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04329.x
69
Zhang, Y., Li, Y.E., Zhang, H., and Ku, T., 2019. Near-surface site investigation by seismic interferometry using urban traffic noise in Singapore, Geophysics, 84(2), p.B169-B180. 10.1190/geo2017-0798.1
70
Zhao, K., Yang, Y., and Luo, Y., 2020, Broadband finite frequency ambient noise tomography: A case study in the western United States using USArray, stations, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125, e2019JB019314p. 10.1029/2019JB019314
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국자원공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국자원공학회지
  • Volume : 59
  • No :2
  • Pages :205-217
  • Received Date : 2022-01-19
  • Revised Date : 2022-04-19
  • Accepted Date : 2022-04-26
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32390/ksmer.2022.59.2.205
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • KCI 문헌 유사도 검사
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close